This blog entry was originally posted as a comment on the Robert Fisk And The Closet Of Media 9/11 Self-Censorship blog in response to the catalogue of lies and deceptions perpetrated by the Poseidon handle in his earlier comment titled My Final Solution To TeamQuo Pollution. With assistance from Crimes of Zion, Grim Reaper and Geeez, Poseidon and his support team of shils managed to bury my post hence my decision to post my comments as a blog entry. Poseidon's lies, deceptions and obfuscations are self-evident to any interested party who cares to examine the facts. I once again challenge Peter Sault to address the points I raise. Since Sault himself made these comments, it is Peter Sault a.k.a. Poseidon himself who should address my points, and not his support team of shills. Let's see if Poseidon can rise to my challenge without assistance from his chums.
PlanetQuo, next time you're in Scotland, let me know, we may arrange to meet. Or just talk to me. Just to set the record straight, I am not Nina.
That's a very good idea young sir. After meeting me in the flesh, you would then be able to confirm that the claims made by your friends Crimes of Zion and A Possum Princess along with the psychological theories postulated by Dr. Peter Sault PhD (Postulating Hardcore Dickhead) in respect of of me supposedly being an individual who is afflicted by Narcissistic Personality Disorder, to be entirely without substance. I will be in Scotland in October, so perhaps we might arrange a meeting. It's been years since I last visited Auld Reekie. Are Tynecastle and Easter Road still the middens they were when I last visited these cesspits to watch the mighty Celtic?
With regard to you being Nina, the comments I have passed on this particular issue can be perused here. Peter Sault a.k.a. Poseidon replied to my e-mail the following day. I draw your attention to the fact that he agrees with my observation when he states "it appears that MonkeyZerg is Nina". Note that Poseidon then goes on to suggest that you are Fester, and since Poseidon has claimed elsewhere that he believes Fester to be Eric Hufschmid and the two Daryl Bradford Smiths, it follows that Poseidon believes you to be not only Nina, but Fester, Eric and Daryl too, although I'm not sure which of the two Daryls Poseidon believes you to be. He didn't say if you were the French Daryl or the one in California. Maybe you should asked Peter yourself.
You do indeed write well for a Palestinian since Arabic and not English is the native tongue of the Palestinian. That is where I get my "idea" about "Palestinian literacy" from Majid - by making a clear distinction between two separate languages. Am I correct to state that you are a Palestinian by birth, but did not grow-up in Palestine? My information is that you grew-up in the west, and not the middle-east. Although you have stated yourself to be Palestinian, you have also stated elsewhere on Wake Up From Your Slumber that you are Australian. This is what you said to Crimes of Zion on 8th July:
"Maybe you'll be happy to know I'm also a fellow Australian."
To which Crimes of Zion responded:
"That's that. I know mate, I had you in mind when I said it. You, Traveller, stoneskull, Michael, me. Those are the ones I know of, but I've forgotten someone I think."
So unless you have dual citizenship, you cannot possibly be Palestinian and Australian at the same time. For the record, which one of these three scenarios is correct?
a) You are Palestinian
b) You are Australian
c) You are a dual citizen of Palestine and Australia
You appear to have completely missed my point about pseudonyms Majid. It can be quite confusing trying to figure-out who is who when people are posting on different forums under different pseudonyms. If people chose one pseudonym and stuck with it, there would be less confusion about who is who. You say that your name is Majid Zak yet earlier in this thread you state your name to be Majid Zakaria. This would be akin to me stating my name to be Jim Ke or Poseidon stating his name to be Peter Sau. As I say, it is better to have only one name and one pseudonym. This way, there can never be any confusion about who is who.
You say that I "seem to call a lot of people using names." Actually Majid, I don't. I focus exclusively on your friends A Possum Princess and Crimes of Zion, along with Poseidon and Suzette the Whippette. I would hardly define this quartet as "a lot of people." While you are correct to state that Poseidon did not introduce his sorry self to me as Pissodeion, you should realise that I certainly don't recall introducing myself him to as PlanetQuisling, PlanetClousseau or TeamQuo. Although Crimes of Zion and A Possum Princess know my handle to be PlanetQuo, rarely do they refer to me by my preferred name. To them, I am PlanetQueer, PlanetPedantic, and several other less than complimentary names. "So why give me special treatment?", you enquire. I'm not giving you "special treatment" Majid. I haven't done any wordplay on either 'MonkeyZerg' or 'Majid' since you haven't attacked me or insulted me.
I too opened a MySpace account on the back of Daryl Bradford Smith's recommendation. It was on Smith's glowing recommendation of NOLAJBS that I also became a member of that shithole. I presume that's why you joined NOLAJBS too. I realised months ago that MySpace is a completely and utterly useless medium for fighting Zionism. The amount of disinformation flowing around over there is beyond belief. 'Waste of Space' would be a more apt description for Rupert Murdoch's website. The place is crawling with spooks.
I closed my account in May, but was compelled to re-activate it to prevent Crimes of Zion from stealing my unique Internet handle of Planetquo like he did here. This was a smart move on my part given that your friend Nina has also stolen my handle and used it to create a fake PlanetQuo profile. If your friend Nina ever attacks me via this fake profile that she has created, then she can rest assured that she will be repaid in kind. Nina had no legitimate reason whatsoever for creating that profile in the first place since I had not created any profiles in her name. It would appear that your friend has a seriously acute case of Mumps (Multiple Unique MySpace Profile Syndrome). Perhaps she should consult a psychiatrist about her addiction.
I take your point about the MonkeyZerg handle, and will respect your wishes. Monkey Zerg it is then - as you wish. You can call me PlanetQuo, PQ, Quo, Jim, or Jimmy. I care about not about whichever pariticular name you might choose. To clarify, the terms Orangutan and Monkey Meths were not a pisstake of yourself. As I've already stated, since you haven't pissed me off, I have no reason to mock or insult you. The aforementioned jibes were aimed exclusively at Crimes of Zion, and not yourself. Since your friend considers it fair-game to insult me regarding the fact that I have only one arm, I in turn consider his remarkable resemblance to a Chimpanzee to be fair-game. Fair enough Monkey Zerg?
With regard to your disclaimer, I am already aware of how you came to be involved with Linton. You were one of the first to acknowledge his presence on Wake Up From Your Slumber. You are a lot smarter than Linton. Although you were concerned about your friend Nina, you did not appoint yourself as her knight in shining armour and ride into the Daryl Bradford Smith Indicted thread on a white horse acting like some medieval hero attempting to rescue a damsel in distress. You wisely kept out of the fray, and that is why I have not bothered you. This is the comment that your pal Crimes of Zion went apeshit over (pun intended). Would you not agree this comment had nothing whatsoever to do with Crimes of Zion? Where is his name mentioned? Where is he attacked?
I have a few more questions that I'd like to put you Monkey Zerg. Since my comments were directed specifically at Poseidon and A Possum Princess, what right did Crimes of Zion have to attack me for commenting on them? Do you believe that his response was proportionate to the imagined slight? Do you feel that your friend Nina was worth three months of fighting and discord? Would you not agree that to wear an IDF t-shirt is to show support for a bunch of degenerate, murdering scum, and would you not also agree that to wear this disgusting t-shirt is an insult to the memory of Rachel Corrie? I have no problem with you Monkey Zerg, but your two MySpace friends suck big time. Fin.
My initial post in this thread was germane to the topic on hand, and then TeamQuo jumped in with off-topic personal BS and absurd speculations about person A = person B in the absence of any credible evidence.
What a liar you are Poseidon. You delude yourself if you believe that you can slip these blatant lies into your posts and expect to get away with it. Inspection of my first three posts on this thread confirm all my comments to be specific and on-topic:
Poseidon makes his first post immediately after I have made my third. The final three paragraphs of Poseidon's post concentrate almost exclusively on disinformation and Zionist agents, and in the third last paragraph. he slips this in:
"I hasten to add that I do not have a famous secret alter ego, much as the tinfoil brigade would like to speculate."
This comment has nothing whatsoever to do with Robert Fisk, and everything to do with Poseidon - he made it, and it is about himself. End of discussion. Poseidon's snide comment could only have been addressing myself, Michael and Quasimodo since it is the three of us who have openly stated on several occasions that Poseidon IS Peter Sault, though neither Quasimodo, Michael, or I consider Peter Sault to be famous nor Poseidon's real-life identity to be a 'secret'. Although Poseidon does not mention and of us by name, Michael, Quasimodo and myself are the "tinfoil brigade" to whom he refers.
I begin my fourth post by challenging Poseidon on his support for a journalist who claims that Arabs carried-out the 9-11 attacks. I tell him that he is a disgrace and a traitor to the anti-Zionist movement. I don't care what anyone says: when a supposed anti-Zionist consistently tries to destroy the reputation and research of an honest journalist who is, without question THE best 9-11 researcher around, then defends another who would have us believe that Arabs did 9-11, then that 'anti-Zionist' is, as far as I am concerned, a traitor to the movement. I then quote Poseidon's "I hasten to add that I do not have a famous secret alter ego, much as the tinfoil brigade would like to speculate" remark before taking him to task on his comment.
Poseidon drew first-blood with his "tinfoil brigade" insult, and had he kept his big mouth shut, there would have been no need for me to engage him. Since it was Poseidon who introduced the issue of his "secret alter-ego" to the conversation in the first place, Poseidon was the first to stray off-topic. Poseidon issued the first insult here, not I.
The same thing happened when I answered nobodaddy's call for someone to embed a video on another thread. (It was subsequently added to the top of the blog.) Within hours, the hecklers from the lunatic fringe of the movement had started to post off-topic personal attacks and insults.
Which thread might that be Peter? Where did NoboDaddy seek your assistance? It evidently wasn't here. Show me the thread where these "hecklers from the lunatic fringe of the movement" ganged-up on poor, old Peter Poseidon, the singular voice of truth, reason and sanity - the 'independent' researcher who consistently tells us that THE best 9-11 researcher the movement has is a 'Zionist agent'. Poseidon's absurd theories of Christopher Bollyn being a Zionist agent, and of there being two Daryl Bradford Smiths, pitches Peter Poseidon right in there with with the loonies on the fringes. Peter can dish the insults and attacks, but goes all paranoid and complains of being 'ganged-up' on when they are returned. You're pathetic Sault.
In another thread, the usual suspects worked themselves up into such a lather that no less than four people - two of them women - were told to "go f*** yourself". And that was all within a single sentence of PlanetQuo's emotionally incontinent response
Big deal. I told the two female of your team to go fuck themselves. So what? I do recall Nina complaining about Duped's alleged sexism, and I'm treating her and the Baguette as equals. What's wrong with that Mister Morality? Why should it be acceptable for men to be told to go fuck themselves, and not women? Are you suggesting that women be treated differently from men? Are you sexist or just a eunuch? The two girlies of Team Poseidon like to get stuck-in, and if they're both prepared to dish the insults out, then they should be prepared to take them back. Why should exceptions be made simply on the basis of them being women? Tell me Peter, why do you make no objection to the chimp stating that he'd love to fuck Nina, but make a HUGE issue out of me telling her to go fuck herself? As far as I'm concerned the four members of Team Poseidon can all go fuck themselves - or each other should they so desire.
This has happened time and again over the last few months. First PlanetQuo (Jim Kerr) attacked Crimes of Zion (Jamie Linton) when they had a disagreement, and spent the next few months attacking him here and on his website.
You just can't stop lying Peter, can you? You get caught in one lie, so you tell another to try and cover-up the first. You're incredible, absolutely incredible. You state that I first "attacked" Crimes of Zion. You are a lying toad Sault, and your blatant, bare-faced lie is easily proven as the blatant, bare-faced lie that it is. My first two posts on the Daryl Bradford Smith Indicted thread:
Where do I attack Crimes of Zion? Speak up Peter, I can't hear you. Maybe you didn't hear my question. I'll ask it again a little louder just in case: WHERE DO I ATTACK CRIMES OF ZION? It evidently isn't here. You made a statement that you knew to be a lie Poseidon. People who make statements they know to be untrue are known as liars. You are a liar. A teller of untruths. A bearer of falsehoods. A fibber. A dirty, lying bastard. In response to my second post on the Daryl Bradford Smith Indicted thread, came this torrent from James 'I am the victim' Linton:
The Big Green Monster Rears It's Ugly Head
Michael The Exposer
Planet Quo M.I.A
The Status Of Quo
Simple
FAQ
Third Time Lucky
The Tangled Webs We Weave
P's And Q's
Quoted From My Comment
Still No Quo
Infensus Mentis Exposed
The Roaring Silence
Done
Grim Reality
Shills and Shillery
CoZ = DD = QV = IM =JL = BO = etc etc
Would you like to withdraw your "First PlanetQuo (Jim Kerr) attacked Crimes of Zion (Jamie Linton)" comment Peter? Your statement is a demonstrable lie. Your team mate Crimes of Zion attacked me first. That is a fact Peter, and no matter how many times you lie about this fact, this fact will always be a fact, and that's a fact Peter. That you are a proven liar is also a fact Peter. Prior to Linton appearing here as Crimes of Zion, he was Infensus Mentis, the narcissistic celebrity MySpacer. I binned Infensus Mentis in early May. That's a fact.
Less than two weeks after Linton was binned he re-invented himself as Crimes of Zion then came here and started attacking me. That's a fact Peter, and everyone who was around when Linton kicked-off on 16th May knows this to be fact. You know it to be a fact Peter, but still you lie. Infensus Mentis appears to have gone all shy. I wonder why. You're a clever chap Peter - go figure. What was that you were saying about "zero public interest" Peter? Do speak, I'm having difficulty hearing you. It wasn't such a clever idea for him to come here and declare war after all, was it Peter? Stealing my handle then using it to create a Google blogspot was a dumb move as well, wasn't it Peter? Although MySpace have deleted the Crimes of Zion profile I created, it will re-appear here early next week. When Linton stops abusing my unique Internet handle and deletes his 'planetquo.blogspot', I'll do likewise. Fair enough?
Then Suzette (whippette) had the initiative to contact CoZ and apossumprincess (Nina), both of whom, in Kerr's twisted little fantasy world, were "Zionist agents". So Kerr attacked Suzette for "acting unilaterally", because he perceived her actions as a threat to his perverted world-view.
The words initiative and Whippette are mutually exclusive. The bland old hag would have difficulty spelling the word never mind understanding its meaning. The whip girl's sudden 'initiative' was nothing but a ploy to rescue Linton from the predicament he found himself in regarding his non-existent landline via which he connects to the Internet. Perusal of the timeline of the Linton landline saga shows how the computer programme otherwise known as Suzette 'The Mole' Bates blew her cover while attempting to rescue her beleagured "cute", "charming", blaspheming, abortion-approving, drug-dealing team mate.
I contacted Bates the day after she called Linton on his mobile phone to express my displeasure at her actions. I remind Bates that:
"When one is part of a team, one must sing from the same hymn sheet as one’s team mates, but on this particular occasion, you went solo, and on this occasion, I cannot protect you from the consequences of your own mistake. You chose to be a loose cannon, and in doing so, you have compromised us all. And since you have chosen to go-it-alone, any further statements that you make on WUFYS should be made in your own name, and not mine or Michael's."
My actions are hardly representative of someone with a "perverted world view" - they are representative of someone who was very angry at a member of his team helping a sworn enemy wiggle off the hook. I considered Bates unilateral actions as detrimental. She completely underminded Michael and myself. I perceived her actions as treachery. Bates' subsequent alignment with Team Poseidon and her attacks on us since demonstrate the point adequately. I look forward to the day when the rat turns on you too Peter as she did with Michael and I, Eric and Daryl. Your day will come Doctor Sault.
I had been corresponding with Kerr for a few weeks. He and Michael had been promising to come up with reams of evidence, the result of their "meticulous research", that would prove certain people were Zionist shills. When their promises came to naught, and I saw how Kerr had treated Suzette, I decided to tell Kerr I had concluded that his ideas were far-fetched and highly unlikely. This was the trigger for his attacks on me, such as the ridiculous claim that I am "Peter Sault".
Lies, lies, lies, and more lies still. We promised you nothing. Since you have made this claim, I challenge to produce evidence in support of it. Can you do that Peter Porky? Show me when this 'promise' was given. Why would Michael and I want to share our evidence with you? You were told only what we felt you should know. Do you seriously believe that either of us ever trusted you? Gimme a break. You were flagged months ago shill. You tried playing the same game that Linton played. You lost like he did. It was fun playing though Poseidon - a real hoot. Thanks for the laughs.
The disinformation you sent was incredible. Our particular favourite piece is the highly-amusing 'O'Connell chemtrails in Esperance operation' theory of yours. That was a scream. It was almost as funny as the 'US Homeland Security rented a house in Mount Lawley' theory which in turn was almost as funny as 'the two Daryls'. It's funny that you're funny when you're being serious, and unfunny when you are trying to be funny. Humour is not your strongest suite Peter. You do excel in telling whopping lies, deceiving, obfuscating, peddling disinformation, and postualting absurd theories though. The chimp - your team mate - agrees with me 100% on the latter point. Give the boy a banana.
Poor old Suzette. Big, bad Jim said her that she was a stupid cow, and told to go forth and copulate with herself. Although I did not blaspheme Jesus - unlike yours and her team mate Crimes of Zion - you would have us believe that the 'Jesus should've been aborted' e-mail that the asshole received from Daryl Bradford Smith was "relatively mild" compared to me telling her that she is a stupid bitch who should go fuck herself. And you have the brassneck to tell me that I have a "perverted world view."
It was when you were informed that I was going after the whip girl that YOU turned nasty with me, you slithering, lying snake. In your e-mail of 17th July you state (my emphasis):
"Should you decide to launch a "nuke" attack on Suzette, we might be compelled to respond in kind. Our team has an arsenal of nukes, such as email correspondence including "Stupid Suzette" and examples of PlanetQuo theories such as "60% Jews in Mount Lawley", or "Smith, Rivero, Glenn and Linton are all Zionist agents who conspired to set Suzette up for an attack", which could be used in a "PlanetQuo debunked" campaign. But this would be a waste of our time and energy."
There it is in black and white before your very eyes, you lying toad.YOU threatened me. My dispute with the whip girl was none of your business, just as the comments I made about Nina's IDF t-shirt was none of Linton's business. You involved yourself in my affairs. YOU then attacked me on this website on 21st July when you compared me to a mass-murdering, rapist. How sick is this? You are lowlife, scum Poseidon. Eight days later, you published this pile of shite on your website. I had not attacked you in any way whatsoever here or anywhere else prior to you hitting me with those two pieces yet you lie through the skin of your teeth and claim that I attacked you first. If people cannot see you for the bare-faced liar that you are, then they haven't been paying attention. Your own words PROVE CONCLUSIVELY that you have lied. You are damned by your own testimony. Only a professional shill could lack the sense of shame that you do. You are a psychopath Sault - a habitual liar with no conscience. Fuck you.
I had noticed that around last Easter (early April), Kerr had written of the death of a family member, in his correspondence with Linton that Kerr had chosen to publish. When it got to the point where Kerr was attacking me and calling me a "Zionist shill", I decided I would try to be nice and try to help.
First of all, I challenge you to produce a statement from me prior to 21st July wherein I attack you. You made the claim - now produce evidence to substantiate it. Once again you resort to your regular shill trick of quoting me on something I did not say, so once again I challenge you to produce me a statement made prior to 21st July wherein I state you to be a Zionist shill. Although I have long suspected you to be a crypto Zionist, and although I have known since March that you are most definitely a shill, I had made no public statements to this effect prior to the attack you made on me on this forum on 21st July. I no longer suspect you of being a Zionist shill - I'm convinced that you are.
Not only do you attack me and deeply insut me by using my father's death as a means to bolster your Narcissistic Personality Theory, you add further insult to injury by claiming that you were being "nice" and trying to "help". I swear before God almighty, if I ever catch-up with you in real-life I'll re-arrange that ugly face of yours. You've gone way, way over the boundaries of decency with your very personal and deeply insulting remarks.
At this point, I thought that TeamQuo were timewasters and bullshitters. I said I did not think that Kerr was a Zionist shill, or even a bad person, but he did have psychological issues, which could have been exacerbated by a tragic event such as the loss of a family member.
Who the fuck are you to make judgments on the state of anyone's mental health, you arrogant, self-righteous prick? You have no received no formal training in the field of mental health, you possess no vocational qualifications in this discipline, and you have no experience in the medical discipline of psychiatry. You've never met me, you've never spoken to me. Your only interpersonal interaction with me is seven weeks of e-mail correspondence yet despite all these relevant factors you state unequivocally that I have "psychological issues." And even if I did have "psychological issues", I do not see how bereavement can possibly lead to the development of Narcisstic Personality Disorder. Bereavement is far more likely to lead to depression and maybe even suicidal thoughts. Where you fucked-up big time Doctor Sault, is that you did not know that my baby son died from meningitis aged a year and a day. Nor did you know that this life-changing event happened within three years of me having my arm traumatically amputated. Why then, after having survived these two personal catastrophes and after having rebuilt my life, should I suddenly crumble and develop NPD decades later? Answer me that Mr. fucking shrink.
Of course, Kerr then went berserk, playing the death card as a means of attacking me by claiming I had deliberately used it to attack him.
Once again you are trapped by your own lies. YOU played the death card you worthless piece of shite. YOU were the one who dragged my father's death into the discussion when you tried to use it as a means of propping-up your NPD theory. I do not 'claim' that you "deliberately used it" to attack me - I state unequivocally, specifically, unambiguously and without reservation, that you did so. At 17:32 on 8th August on this website, you published the following statement:
"I don't believe Kerr is working for the Zionists, and I don't really think he is a "bad" person. I do know that for two or three weeks after Easter, he remained in Scotland following the death of a family member, and I wonder whether this tragic event could have transformed a mild case of narcissistic personality disorder into a more severe, emotionally and intellectually crippling version.
My report on PlanetQuo / Jim Kerr is available here:
http://www.takeourworldback.com/quo/
...which also includes links to the voicemail message, email message, and a very long concatenation of correspondence for those who are sufficiently interested to take an in-depth look at what transpired."
Your statement of 8th August provides conclusive evidence that YOU deliberately attacked me by suggesting that my father's death might have "transformed a mild case of narcissistic personality disorder into a more severe, emotionally and intellectually crippling version." You state that I "went beserk." Really? I wasn't posting on WUFYS when you made your statement of 8th August. Indeed, had you not made this deeply-insulting statement I would most probably have continued my hiatus. It is precisely because of your statement that I have returned. And now that I have returned, you will get no peace. EVERY comment you make here until you the day you leave here will be met with a response from me. As for going "beserk", WHEN you I finally come face-to-face, I will show what going beserk really means. You don't know who or what you're dealing with here Sault. One day you will. Consider that a promise written in stone.
But TeamQuo proved my point when they confirmed that it had been Jim's father, and Jim reacted badly. This appears to have been the event that tipped Jim into the narcissistic abyss.
You cunt Sault. There is no 'TeamQuo' angle to this, no 'Team Poseidon' angle either. This about me, Jim Kerr, and you, Peter Sault. That's all there is to it - just me and you, no "they." I realise that you experience insurrmountable difficulties in accepting that Jim Kerr and Michael Stewart are two separate and uniquely different persons, but this has nothing to do with Michael. As I say, it's all about you and I. You made a deeply-insulting statement and I took offence. What were you expecting me to do, buy you a fucking cigar and slap on you on the back? Send you a thank you card for your unsolicited "help?" Rather than apologise and retract your spiteful remarks as any decent, warm-blooded human being would do, you headed in the opposite and attemped to qualify your statement. And in doing so you confirm that of the two of us, you are the one with the tendency for narcissistic actions. You are so far up your own arse, it's untrue. You of all people forfeit the right to cast aspersions upon the mental health of others given that you once had a "psychotic episode." Poor you, it must have been so HARD ON you. Now I know why you're such a wanker - you can't get it up. Is the 'auld lad' still sleeping on the job Peter, or has Viagra stiffened your resolve?
Kerr seems to be one of those types that, when you try to help them, they just turn it against you and claim it was an "attack".
Listen up, you pompous, sanctimonious prick, if I ever need assistance of any kind from another human being, I'd never seek any from you. I don't ever recall asking you for "help." If I ever need help, I'll ask a friend. Gone is your cockiness (pun intended) and your certainty. I now "seem" to be "one of those types." What "types" might you be referring to Doctor Sault? Your usual precision has suddenly become engulfed by vagueness. I did not ask you for "help", and since I did not request assistance from you, nothing is being "turned against you" except your own statement of 8th August. I do not "claim" that your statement was an attack - I state it to be unequivocally so.
Over the previous year, his relatively cosy world-view would have been shattered as he learned about the evils of Zionism and the associated warmongering and terrorism.
How would you know what my belief system might have been at any point in my life? You have never been privy to such information therefore your statement is nothing more than speculation designed to qualify your earlier statements. Your arrogant assumptions and presumptions are way off base. I realised in my teens that the world was badly screwed-up. What I did not know back in the 1970s was why. You speak of a "relatively cosy world-view" but in doing so, you expose yourself as an out-and-out bullshitter since you do not have an inkling of what my world-view might have been. And since you have no reference point, how can you state my world-view to be 'relative'?
Then, around December to March, he got into an argument with Brendon O'Connell on an internet forum.
Wrong again Peter. Either you are a liar or a poor researcher. Since the latter is false, the former must then be the case. I did not "get into an argument" with the O'Connell handle - the O'Connell handle got into an argument with me. You already know this to be this to be the case. As was the case with the Poseidon handle, and as was the case with the Crimes of Zion handle, I was attacked first before responding. Those are the facts Peter, and no amount of your spin, deception, and re-invention of history can ever alter the fact that these facts are facts. What is happening here with the Poseidon handle is a repetition of what happened with the Crimes of Zion handle, and what happened with the Crimes of Zion handle is a repetition of what happened with the O'Connell handle. Same people, same Zionist infiltrators, same tactics in each case. All roads lead to NOLAJBS, Are you reading this Daryl. Are you reading this Eric? N-O-L-A-J-B-S. Rememember? And what connects Poseidon, Crimes of Zion, A Possum Princess, Geeez, the Brendon O'Connell handle and Rowan Berkeley? N-O-L-A-J-B-S. For crying out loud folks, wake up from your slumber. They're all here. This forum has been infiltrated.
Then his father died, after wasting away from cancer.
Yes, I know. I was by his side when he died. Seconds later I had become afflicted with Narcissistic Personality Disorder. I immediately left my Dad's bedside and headed for the men's room to take a look at myself in the mirror. After gazing at myself for hours on end, I made my way into Glasgow city centre to have an 'I am absolutely briliant' t-shirt printed. Vain, I agree, but my t-shirt would not have offended Rachel Corrie's parents. After my t-shirt was printed, I then made my way to Martha Street registry office to get married to myself. It didn't bother me at all that my dad had just died. I could think only of how cool I am and of how I could elicit praise and adulation from others.
So O'Connell, along with anyone who failed to lavish Kerr with sufficient praise and adulation, and half the people on the internet, were suddenly transformed into "Zionist agents" who were out to get him.
The O'Connell handle introduced himself by asking me if I was a "fucking retard." That was what the O'Connell entity said to me on the NOLAJBS forum on 26th January 2007. In view of this unconventional method of introducing oneself, why would I expect the O'Connell handle to "lavish" me with "sufficient paise and adulation?" This makes no sense whatsoever, but I have come to expect nothing other than nonsensical waffle from the Poseidon handle. You don't half come out with some complete and utter shite Peter. "Half the people on the Internet", you say. Three questions for you Poseidon. How many people are on the Internet? Why do you believe that 50% of this unspecified number of Internet users have conspired to "get" me? Why do you believe that several million people have metamorphosed into Zionist agents? Your estimate makes Eric Hufschmid's appear conservative.
He then concluded that the friends were never real friends after all, merely "bits of HTML code".
"Friends"? O'Connell? Are you on drugs Peter? Have you been at the Chimp's Meths stash? Linton? Bates? Are you seriously expecting people to believe that these two were my friends? Linton was an infiltrator who was identified and duly binned. Ditto Bates. What a 'coincidence; it is that my two dear, beloved "friends" turn out to be part of the team that you operate. Shills of a feather. The whip girl is indeed a bit of HTML code. Baboon boy says so himself:
And consider how Kerr writes about how he is utterly ruthless in dealing with enemies, he gives no quarter, takes no prisoners, and makes no gender allowances
Why be anything but ruthless with one's enemies? What would you expect me to be with those who seek to destroy my good name, my character, and my credibility? Should I invite them round to dinner? Holiday together? Hug them?
Yet Kerr starts crying like a baby as soon as someone suggests that bereavement just might have caused him some personal issues.
Who asked you for your opinion on my bereavement? My father's death wasn't an issue until you made it an issue, and the reason you made it an issue was so that you could use my father's death as a weapon against me. That much is abundantly clear. That you have chosen to attack me on this front means that there are no longer any taboos. You can expect to be repaid in kind Sault. In any case, you know nothing about me nor are you qualified to make psychiatric assessments. In view of this, shut the fuck up Doctor Sault. No one except you and your team of shills is interested in your psychobabble.
TeamQuo have shown that they are only interested in noise, heat and distractions, which is contrary to the purposes of this forum.
Who are this 'TeamQuo' that you keep referring to? There is me, there is Michael. We see ourselves as a partnership rather than a team. 'TeamQuo' ended when the whip girl revealed herself to be an infiltrator from Team Poseidon. What Michael and I are interested in is exposing crypto Zionists such as yourself, Crimes of Zion and A Possum Princess. This we have successfully achieved. Mission accomplished. Thank you all for helping us achieve our objective. You three are damaged goods.
Although I will still be aware of their posts, I am going to ignore them until such time as they can demonstrate their willingness to get back to fighting Zionism as opposed to each other.
Michael and I are not fighting "each other", you imbecile - we're battling you and your team of Zio-shills. Your 'ignore us' policy didn't last long, did it Peter? As for fighting Zionism, all any observer need do is take a look at my last two blog entries then take a look at your last two posts, and they'll soon discover which of us is here to fight Zionism, and which of us is here to attack genuine anti-Zionists.
The Nina email was sent to PlanetQueer on Wednesday, April 25, as evidenced by the date on the email. From: J L To: Webmaster Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2007 10:25 AM Subject: Re: Quo Vadis = Donnie Darko
Nina a.k.a. A Possum Princess a.k.a. Eireann Goddess has only ever sent one-email direct to me. This e-mail was sent via my website on 12th May. Click on image for magnified view. The e-mail to which the meths addict refers to is one that Nina SENT TO HIM. Big difference.
You broke the agreement by forwarding it to Suzette sometime before May 5, 2007, which is when she posted it on the NOLAJBS forum.
Which agreement are you talking about Junkie? This one?:
Injected Meths a.k.a. Chimp of Zion:
"I have a fair bit of information from Nina that I'll pass on to you if you can assure me that it will be used for your interest only. No publishing on your site, no sharing with Hufschmid, no fucking around. I don't want her to be seen to be weighing in on it, especially via me."
PlanetQuo:
"I give you my word that any information that you give me regarding Nina aka 'A Possum Princess' will not be published on any of my websites or shared with Eric Hufschmid."
Where is Suzette's name in my statement dipshit? Our agreement was that I would not share it with Eric Hufschmid. You did not ask that I not share this information the whip girl. You were outsmarted dipshit. Get over yourself dipshit. You asked that the information you supplied on your beloved Nina's behalf be restricted to my personal use only. I did not agree to your request hence there was no agreement made that could be broken dipshit. Perhaps you were off your head on meths and weed at the time dipshit. You fucked-up bigtime dipshit, didn't you dipshit? What a prick you are Linton.
Why all the fuss Junkie boy of Jew Central? Here's what your gaffer said:
"I thought about this and really, it shouldn't be a problem. You can tell whomever whatever you wish."
"Anyway, divulge whatever you wish... but please just use your best judgement and remember that I'm relatively defenseless and easily imperiled."
So what's your problem dipshit? Is your ego struggling to accept the fact I outsmarted you dipshit? It would appear so. Sounds like a bad case of NPD you got there Junkie boy.
Breaking a promise and then whinging about being "attacked" when you're called on it is pussy shit.
No promise was broken dipshit. When will you get that fact into your meths-rotted brain dipshit? Your pretext is clear Zio shill. You came here to declare war. You said so yourself. YOU brought YOUR personal issues to Wake Up From Your Slumber - YOU chose this venue as a battleground, not me. Your ploy failed miserably though, so why not fuck-off back to MySpace where you belong dipshit? Take that stupid cow Suzette and your boss Nina with you when you go.
