James Linton often speaks in percentage terms. He would have you believe that there are only 72 Jews resident in the Perth suburb of Mount Lawley. Mount Lawley is one of the most exclusive and expensive suburbs of Perth. Where money is to be found so also are Jews, and where Jews are to be found, so also are Synagogues. It is difficult to believe that Mount Lawley's synagogue caters for a maximum congregation of seventy-two Jews. Crimes of Zion would have you believe that almost a fifth of Mount Lawley's Jewish community are involved in the management of the Temple David Synagogue.
Crimes of Zion considers 72 in 6000 to be the definition of the word many. I don't. A ratio of 72:6000 does not constitute or form a large number. Seventy-two Jews cannot be considered numerous. Yet this is precisely what Crimes of Zion has stated. If a University is not to be considered as a credible source, then what on earth is? According to the University of Sydney's history department, the Jewish population of Perth numbers around 6,000, with many residing in Mount Lawley. How much is many? Who knows?
One thing is certain though - 72 out if 6,000 is NOT MANY. Only an imbecile or a crypto Jew would argue otherwise. Crimes of Zion has gone to extraordinary lengths to play-down the Jewishness of Mount Lawley a.k.a. Jewtown. Go figure. It's not rocket science.
The final word regarding the Jews of Mount Lawley goes to James Linton's 'English' friend Poseidon, webmaster of the crypto Zionist website takeourworldback.com:
"In your latest page on Linton, it seems to confuse the Mount Lawley population of 10,000 with the 10,000 Jews in Perth. It's only "many of" the 6,000 Jews who live in Mount Lawley, not all 6,000. But if "many of" them is half of them, say, then 3,000 Jews in Mount Lawley's population of 10,000 places Linton's chances of being Jewish at 30%. It's certainly well above the global ratio of Jews to non-Jews, or even the US ratio." (Source)
I rest my case.
As can be seen, Crimes of Zion. like most people, expresses percentages with the percentage symbol written after the relevant digit(s).
On 10th August 2007, Crimes of Zion temporarily changed his method of expressing percentages by having the percentage symbol precede the digits. This was a one-off. He has not been known to have used this alternative style prior to 10th August, or anytime after that date.
I have encountered only two names who express the percentage symbol before the digits - James Linton and Brendon O'Connell. Both names have a fixation with 80% - %80.
WAKE UP FROM YOUR SLUMBER
James Linton a.k.a. Infensus Mentis a.k.a. Crimes of Zion
