|
Revised: January 6, 2008

Jim Kerr, webmaster of PlanetQuo.com and PlanetQuo.net and hereafter described as "PlanetQuo", claims that I, Poseidon, webmaster of TakeOurWorldBack.com, have "published" the address of an innocent family, and have placed them at threat of harassment or even physical attack from people turning up at their door looking for PlanetQuo. In fact, I circulated some details privately to get feedback from a few associates and correspondents, some of whom have been viciously libelled and slandered for the best part of a year by this repulsive, paranoid, cantankerous little creep, and who are interested in tracking down PlanetQuo's private address with a view to taking legal action against him. It was an interesting lead that deserved to be followed up. I also conducted an operation to gather information on the identity of PlanetQuo's collaborators and partners-in-crime, as described below.
PlanetQuo claims to have sent an email of complaint about TakeOurWorldBack to a real estate agent, and provides a copy. In the email, he tries to pass himself off as an "injured party", trying to suggest that there is a "hate campaign" against him, and he is devoting his time and money trying to stop innocent people from getting hurt. WRONG, SUNSHINE!! That's exactly why the rest of us got involved, to counter PLANETQUO'S unprovoked attacks and deliberate disinformation and slander on innocent third parties. Consider the following statement published on his website: [warning - his webpage at the preceding link contains pornographic, blasphemous image(s)]
PlanetQuo implies, misleadingly, that someone has already suffered some form of physical attack or harassment as a result of material published by myself, and then he conveniently "forgets" to mention the many cases of innocent victims who have had their security compromised by his spiteful, vindictive decision to publish their personal details. PlanetQuo's behavior, including his accusations that others are guilty of the very charges he is guilty of, and his being quite happy to dish out libellous claims but crying like a baby whenever his poisonous piffle is shot down in flames, is rather like the school bully who has been tormenting girls and little children for years. Then, when he gets a richly deserved taste of his own medicine, he runs off squealing to the teacher.
As PlanetQuo points out, he speaks "with a heavy Glaswegian accent", is "bald", and has "only one arm". Exactly, and since people who are interested in recovering damages from PlanetQuo know all that and have seen his photo, his above scenario of a namesake being confused with a corpulent, "bald, 48 year-old Glaswegian with his left arm missing" is about as credible as the concept of John Reid being mistaken for John Redwood.
I am going to give PlanetQuo seven (7) days from the date of this update, i.e. until January 12, 2008, to remove personal information relating to Suzette aka Whippette from his site. Failing that, TakeOurWorldBack will publish personal information relating to relatives of his friend Eric Hufschmid and their ancestry. What say ye - fair enough?
Update: PlanetQuo did not remove the information by the deadline. Hence, a page has been created on Eric Hufschmid's connection to the Jews of Lithuania: http://www.takeourworldback.com/quo/hufschmidlithuanianconnection.htm And here is another page debunking some of Kerr's recently published propaganda: http://www.takeourworldback.com/quo/bunkdequod.htm
Please allow me a moment to elaborate on the distinction between "publishing" and "privately circulating" material. One obvious method of private circulation would be email(s) sent to a group of recipients. However, if a webpage is created and there are no inbound hyperlinks to it from anywhere else on the internet, the search engine 'bots will not find it, it will not be indexed by the search engines, and the only people who would be aware of an "orphan page" like that would be those who are provided with the URL. That is, except for the extremely unlikely event that some individual would just happen to guess the URL, or would spend hours trying various random URLs. Anyone who wanted to "publish" a webpage would create at least one inbound hyperlink on another webpage, e.g. the front page of his or her website, or internet forums, so that people would find it.
One advantage of circulating information via a private webpage as opposed to email is that images do not always transmit properly via email. Another advantage for the sender is that the website logs will provide confirmation that a particular recipient has viewed the information. Moreover, if it is done as described below in the case of recipients who give some reason to suspect that they might pass on the information, that can also be tracked. Hence, that was how I sent out the information on the possible uncovering of PlanetQuo's location.
As part of the information gathering exercise described below, there were about half a dozen near copies of the same page with different URLs (which the Kerr family of Doncaster will be able to verify for themselves). The only person who has publicly posted a link to any of the URLs - and thereby exposed the xx Xxxxxx Street address details - is PlanetQuo himself. With his webmastering skills and knowledge of the internet, he could have performed a check on whether the webpage had been made public by searching for some of the words on the page, as in the above screenshot. Yet PlanetQuo took the decision to publish on his website. And if any interested party contacts Brendon O'Connell or Daryl Bradford Smith's webmaster Krister Knutars (via DBS' email address) - two individuals who were sent alternative URLs with the same details more than a week ago - both of them will be aware that those webpages were uploaded more than a week prior to PlanetQuo's publication, even though they did not show on any search engines by the time of this barmy forum-stalking webmaster's publication. The next part of the operation required that the webpage be duplicated across a number of unique URLs.
So, in contrast to my decision to restrict access and keep the information private, PlanetQuo has publicised and promoted the address of an innocent family - the Kerrs of Doncaster - on his website for all the world to see. He has inserted hyperlinks that will allow the search engine 'bots to find and index the webpage. Consequently, it is the Jim "PlanetQuo" Kerr who should publicly apologise to James, Peter and Christine Kerr, and Keith Clough Property Services, for the fiasco of his own creation, and who should remove any webpages bearing the Doncaster address from his website forthwith, before they register on the search engines.
This style of publication with malicious intent is nothing new for the appallingly repugnant webmaster of PlanetQuo.com. Indeed, it is his stock in trade. Earlier in 2007, for example, he and a sidekick named Michael "Fugazi" Stewart of Queensland, Australia, were complaining that Crimes Of Zion (CoZ), a poster at the internet forum Wake Up From Your Slumber, had been "creating" and "distributing" a blasphemous, pornographic image. In fact, CoZ had posted the said image - which he did not create - at the personal MySpace profiles of two of his friends, where it would be seen by a very small number of people. PlanetQuo and Stewart were subsequently so obsessed with scoring points over their adversary by "exposing" CoZ's "distribution" of the image, that they posted the very same image at internet forums and at the front page of PlanetQuo.com, where it would be seen by thousands of visitors in a day. Their unmitigated effrontery and hypocrisy is almost beyond belief!
In the first half of 2007, PlanetQuo was promoting a thesis that I, "Poseidon", was actually another poster who uses the handle "Debus", before being forced to admit he was wrong. He subsequently spent over 4 months publishing his ridiculous "Poseidon = Peter Sault" delusion, which he still refuses to retract in spite of all the evidence!!! Indeed, PlanetQuo has, on a number of occasions, issued threats of physical violence against Peter Sault, whom PlanetQuo falsely accuses of being "me". E.g. "I swear before God almighty, if I ever catch-up with you in real-life I'll re-arrange that ugly face of yours." Source. And: "I'll tell you this Sault. Should I ever have the misfortune to meet you, I will punch your lights out for using my Father's death as an excuse to attack me." Source. And for the best part of 2007, the offensive, warped webmaster of PlanetQuo.com has been promoting all manner of false claims against a number of innocent individuals, who had never attacked him prior to his concerted attempts at character assassination.
Take a look at the email message appended below that PlanetQuo wrote for an innocent American woman, whose only crime was to see through his deceptions, delusions and disinformation, and to choose to contact people that PlanetQuo had forbidden her from contacting. He calls her a "stupid cow", threatens to "nuke" her (she thought he meant some sort of virus that would wipe out the data on her computer), tells her to "go f*?! yourself", etc. This was after he had concluded they were "disinformation agents" and "shills", and was anxious to prevent his whole perverted, paranoid world-view from tumbling like a house of cards. He has recently seen fit to publish details of her private address and telephone number on his website, together with a hit piece that claims that she is "Jewish" because some of her ancestors had German names, and some Jews had German names. Yes, right. His weak inductive reasoning is useless in this particular case, because there is ample evidence that she is a Catholic and is not a Jew.
Listen to the following audio file of a creepy voicemail message that PlanetQuo left on Skype for the same American woman, on May 16, 2007. Press Play (twice) to listen, or rightclick on the link to download the clip.
And take a look at PlanetQuo's mug shot above. Is this really the sort of character one would be happy to bump into in a dark alley, or to have turn up on one's doorstep during the hours of darkness? It is not for nothing that some refer to him as "The Yorkshire Ripper".
In a recent article published at PlanetQuo.com, The Yorkshire Ripper states: "an implicit threat of violence was made by the webmaster of takeourworldback.com himself on another Internet forum."
His broken hyperlink at "implicit threat" is supposed to take one to the Ego Deus forum. In November 2007, several of us had the idea of setting up a trap to ensnare PlanetQuo by pretending to "let slip" that we were working as "disinfo agents". A series of exchanges were posted at the Ego Deus forum, but several time-stamped disclaimers were set up which could then be utilised in the event that PlanetQuo decided to publish his "evidence". This is explained in the video below, which was posted to YouTube on November 30, 2007. And, as the video explains, posts to another internet forum were made in November 2007, in advance of PlanetQuo using the Ego Deus comments as "evidence".
The fact that PlanetQuo did not choose to cite the Ego Deus posts as "evidence" of us having secret connections to Israel demonstrates that he was aware that the exchanges had been set up as a joke. However, when he is clutching at straws, scouring the internet for any so-called "implicit threat of violence" that I might have made, he points to these exchanges at Ego Deus that he was well aware were not meant to be serious.
Compare our prank as described above, with PlanetQuo's threat that he would "re-arrange [Peter Sault's] ugly face" or that he would "punch [Sault's] lights out". Who seems to be serious about threatening violence? Peter Sault never had a bad word to say about PlanetQuo until the latter postulated his loony conspiracy theory that Sault is me, Poseidon. And if you look at PlanetQuo's mug shot at the top of this page, he is no oil painting, and hardly in a position to insult other people regarding their personal appearance!
I have not threatened anyone with physical violence, or sent abusive emails, or left creepy voicemail messages. So much for PlanetQuo's claims that it is I who have been bringing innocent people into the dispute and placing them at risk. The rest of us have merely been responding to, and correcting, the disinformation and lies that have been penned by the warped webmaster of PlanetQuo.com.
It is not known whether PlanetQuo is actually a paid disinformationalist, or whether he is merely a nut and useful idiot employed by professional disinfo agents. There is a convincing case that he is afflicted with paranoia (from his pot smoking) and various mental disorders. Look at what one respected poster, UnitedAgainstZionism, had to say about him at Wake Up From Your Slumber:

For more on the background to this internet war, conducted by the "disaffected Glaswegian" PlanetQuo against half the people he has ever met on the internet, please see: http://www.takeourworldback.com/quo/ For a compilation of absurd theories and amusing quotes from PlanetQuo, please see: http://www.takeourworldback.com/quo/kerrquotes.htm
PlanetQuo and his cronies failed to comprehend the nature of the operation that has been conducted against them, the purpose of which was to ascertain who was collaborating with whom. Messages about the possible discovery of PlanetQuo's current address were sent to a number of suspects who might have been working with PlanetQuo. There was a twist in the tail, in that each suspect was sent a link to what was essentially the same webpage, but with a unique URL. Hence, it would be possible to track which suspect proved to be the source of any "leak" to additional parties.
Brendon O'Connell and Daryl Bradford Smith's webmaster Krister Knutars, for example, showed little interest in the possibility of PlanetQuo being exposed. They eventually looked at their unique keyed URL once, and then moved on to other things. However, in the case of Eric Hufschmid, it was an entirely different matter.
The email to Eric Hufschmid, supplying him with his unique URL, was forwarded via Suzette aka Whippette, who has previously corresponded with him. PlanetQuo doubtless will be as sick as a parrot to learn that she did not leak the information without my knowledge, given that he claims she is "Jewish" and "cannot be trusted". In fact, her forwarding the email to Eric Hufschmid was carried out on my instructions, and was an essential part of the whole exercise.
Hufschmid originally looked at the page within hours of being sent his hyperlink, and - in his time zone, viewed it for a second time four days later on December 22. Both IPs traced to within 50 miles of Goleta, CA. Within half an hour of Eric viewing the URL for a second time, it was viewed by someone anxious to conceal his or her location - someone who used Guardster, an anonymous proxy server. That person, or people using the same proxy and being allocated exactly the same IP, subsequently viewed it on December 23 and December 27. Meanwhile, other hits were logged for that URL from another person using a proxy - Anonymouse.org. This person looked at the URL unique to Eric on December 23 and 28; on the former occasion also viewing four other pages including material on PlanetQuo and Chris Bollyn. On December 23 local time, or December 24 UTC, there was a viewing by a person whose IP traces to Clearfield, PA, US, connecting through Verizon Internet Services.
Since PlanetQuo claims that he first learned of the quostrippedbare.htm webpage on December 22, it therefore follows that if he is telling the truth, then he is very likely the person who used proxy2.guardster.com to view the page.
According to Zionist disinformationalist agents, it is merely a "coincidence" that the self-styled "anti-Zionist" Eric Hufschmid is the half-brother of the wife of James Murdoch, heir apparent to father Rupert's $9 billion Zionist media empire. Hufschmid postulates preposterous theories, such as "Ernst Zundel is a Zionist agent", and "Christopher Bollyn has been abducted by Zionist agents". The agents attempt to justify this by claiming that Eric is a paranoid conspiracy buff who suspects almost everyone of being a Zionist agent. Jim "PlanetQuo" Kerr spends more time knowingly publishing false information and sowing dissent and discord within the anti-Zionist movement, than enlightening newcomers to the very real crimes of the Zionist Mafia. And yet Hufschmid, upon learning of the potentially imminent publication of PlanetQuo's private address, is found to place so much trust in PlanetQuo and to hold him in such regard that he sends him a warning.
In the early part of 2007, PlanetQuo corresponds with Hufschmid and is on friendly terms with him. At the end of 2007, Hufschmid rescues PlanetQuo when it looks like he is about to be exposed. Yet on June 28, 2007, PlanetQuo claims that he is planning to "destroy" Hufschmid (see below). Go figure.
PlanetQuo provided an image of his income tax Self Assessment statement on his own website:
According to PlanetQuo, he earned his money by "the sweat of [his] brow and the application of [his] craft". He tells us that he was an "electrical contractor". Now, PlanetQuo is known to have lost an arm as a result of an incident involving a train whilst he was in a drunken stupor. The incident occurred long ago, probably when he was in his twenties a couple of decades ago. He has implied that the loss of the arm occurred three years prior to the death of his baby son from meningitis: "Where you fucked-up big time Doctor Sault, is that you did not know that my baby son died from meningitis aged a year and a day. Nor did you know that this life-changing event happened within three years of me having my arm traumatically amputated." Source.
Incidentally, PlanetQuo has listed "smoking pot" as one of his likes, and together with his one-time propensity for alcohol, probably smoked tobacco too. It is known that second-hand tobacco smoke has deleterious effects on the health of children, and studies show a link between passive smoking and meningitis, e.g. K Iles, NK Poplawski, RTL Couper (2001). Glasgow has the lowest life expectancy of anywhere in the UK, and as Jim PlanetQuo Kerr said himself, you can take the man out of Glasgow, but you can't take Glasgow out of the man. It has been said that "Smoking prevalence in Scotland is higher than in other parts of the UK and the problem is particularly acute in Glasgow. In the Greater Glasgow Health Board area, smoking prevalence is over 33 per cent, rising to 37 per cent in Glasgow city (NHS Greater Glasgow, 2003). It is estimated that one in five people in Glasgow die because of their smoking habit. Smoking is also the leading cause of inequalities in health. It is the single biggest contributor to the gap in healthy life expectancy between the most and least affluent. In some of the most deprived parts of Glasgow, smoking rates are as high as 63 per cent (NHS Health Scotland, 2005)." Source: .pdf file / text. So this would explain PlanetQuo's personal psychological problems, his belligerence and the massive chip on his shoulder. Although he is not criminally culpable, he feels that he bears some responsibility for the death of his son.
Let's just entertain for the moment the ridiculous notion that a one-armed electrician would be capable of not only earning a decent living, but saving enough into the bargain to have a pension pot sufficient for retiring at the age of 45. PlanetQuo claims to have often worked over 60 hours a week, and to have charged clients up to �40 per hour. However, the average would be well below the mean. He would not be able to charge for all of his time, or get sufficient business to have one job neatly finishing just as another started. Let's assume that he was able to charge an average of �20 per hour, and was able to charge for a mean of 20 hours per week, which would total �400 per week. Allowing �100 per week deductions for tax and national insurance, and a mere �100 for living expenses, that would leave him �200 per week for saving, or about �10,000 per annum. Over 25 years (from age 20 to 45) he would have �250,000. Now admittedly, there would be some growth in his investments, but that would be balanced out by the fact that his earnings would have been lower in the early part of his career, e.g. during the eighties. Let's suppose he can achieve an income of 5% p.a. which would be rather optimistic. So his income would be �12,500 p.a. or �250 per week, and there would be no means for it to keep pace with inflation. A 45-year-old choosing to retire in such a situation, and to devote his entire time to playing silly buggers on the internet? You gotta be joking!
On the other hand, let's suppose PlanetQuo is an extraordinarily hard-working, high-achieving individual with drive and unusual skills in investment, and was able to build a nest egg of, say a million pounds or a couple million dollars. But such a person does not suddenly choose to retire at 45 and spend almost every hour of their waking time engaged in personal vendettas and sliming and slandering innocent people on the internet, breaking off to visit Scotland several times a year. They would be motivated to continue building on their financial success.
Since the notion of a one-armed electrician being able to achieve financial independence and retire at the age of 45 is rather too incredible except for the tinfoil conspiracy theorist, it therefore follows that PlanetQuo must be in receipt of income from a source that does not deduct PAYE (Pay As You Earn) tax. An overseas source such as the Israeli government, for example!
However, it may be argued that it is doubtful that a foreign intelligence agency would be prepared to pay for the 'services' of such an incompetent propagandist as PlanetQuo. He may be merely a fantasist with delusions of grandeur, who lies about his circumstances, and who is exploited by the Zionist Mafia as a useful idiot.
The evidence is more conclusive than ever. Jim Kerr aka PlanetQuo and Eric Hufschmid are working together, with PlanetQuo having the role of Hufschmid's "attack dog". Eric was right about how the Zionists use people who have something wrong with them. Any scrap of remaining credibility that PlanetQuo ever had as an "independent researcher" or an "honest truth teller" has been firmly dispelled. He is merely an E-grade common or garden Murdoch media whore.
Revised: January 6, 2008
[For a good IP tracer, use ip-adress.com. But even this can easily be out by tens of miles, and sometimes will merely resolve to something like socal.re.rr.com - Southern California.]
71.102.142.211 - - [19/Dec/2007:05:07:29 +0000] "GET /quo/quostrippedbare.htm HTTP/1.1" 200 8891 "-" "Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 5.1; .NET CLR 1.1.4322; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.0.04506.30)
71.102.165.3 - - [22/Dec/2007:17:12:20 +0000] "GET /quo/quostrippedbare.htm HTTP/1.1" 200 8891 "-" "Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 5.1; .NET CLR 1.1.4322; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.0.04506.30)
The above two are Eric Hufschmid. The IPs trace to within 50 miles of his location at Goleta, CA, and the first visit was within hours of his being sent the email with the link to this unique URL that was set up to test whether he would prove to be a leaky source. The probability of someone within a 50-mile radius of Goleta just happening to guess the URL and view the page, within a few hours of the hyperlink being sent to Hufschmid, is near enough to zero for all practical purposes.
66.98.198.60 - - [22/Dec/2007:17:38:59 +0000] "GET /quo/quostrippedbare.htm HTTP/1.1" 200 8891 "-" "Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 5.1; SU 3.004)
This is the Nevis-based proxy server Guardster, It was probably PlanetQuo, as he would have found it hard to resist viewing the page for long, after December 22 when he says he was made aware of it. The browser is indicated as IE7, which he is a big fan of. Moreover, Hufschmid would probably have passed the URL on to PlanetQuo in the first instance, and Kerr would subsequently have passed it on to the other members of his team - Stewart and Quasimodo.
66.98.198.60 - - [23/Dec/2007:22:58:00 +0000] "GET /quo/quostrippedbare.htm HTTP/1.1" 200 8891 "-" "Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 5.1; SU 3.004)
Same person as above.
85.195.119.22 - - [24/Dec/2007:00:05:23 +0000] "GET /quo/quostrippedbare.htm HTTP/1.0" 200 8891 "-" "http://Anonymouse.org/ (Unix)
Anonymouse.org as stated. This could be PlanetQuo's crony Michael "Fugazi" Stewart.
71.162.44.216 - - [24/Dec/2007:04:09:39 +0000] "GET /quo/quostrippedbare.htm HTTP/1.1" 200 8891 "-" "Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.0.12) Gecko/20070508 Firefox/1.5.0.12
This is the person in the vicinity of Clearfield, PA, US, - or Olanta in Clearfield County, see below - who connects via Verizon Internet Services. The prime suspect is the poster who uses the handle Quasimodo at the internet forum Wake Up From Your Slumber. Proxy servers can return the wrong characters, e.g. Guardster sometimes displays a "?" in place of an apostrophe. Quasi's job was to capture an accurate reproduction of the page.
The most likely scenario is that Hufschmid emailed PlanetQuo on Saturday December 22, warning him about the message he had received four days previously. Then, late on December 23 by British time, PlanetQuo passed the link on to his team-mates Michael Stewart and Quasimodo.
66.98.198.60 - - [27/Dec/2007:22:50:32 +0000] "GET /quo/quostrippedbare.htm HTTP/1.1" 200 8891 "-" "Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 5.1; SU 3.004)
PlanetQuo again.
85.195.119.22 - - [28/Dec/2007:23:38:50 +0000] "GET /quo/quostrippedbare.htm HTTP/1.0" 200 8891 "-" "http://Anonymouse.org/ (Unix)
Michael Stewart?
71.162.42.239 - - [30/Dec/2007:17:46:16 +0000] "GET /quo/quostrippedbare.htm HTTP/1.1" 200 685 "http://planetquo.com/" "Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.0.12) Gecko/20070508 Firefox/1.5.0.12
This is the American visitor from Pennsylvania - suspected of being Quasimodo - who viewed the page on December 24, or late on December 23 his local time. This particular IP traces to Olanta of Clearfield County, PA. The 685 bytes transferred which may be seen following the code 200 - as opposed to the previous figures of 8891 - demonstrate that at this point, soon after PlanetQuo published his PlanetQuo Stripped Bare response, I had deleted the previous content and replaced it with a statement that "An article will appear shortly".
71.162.42.239 - - [30/Dec/2007:17:51:05 +0000] "GET /quo/quostrippedbare.htm HTTP/1.1" 304 - "http://takeourworldback.planetquo.net/Site_Pages/Poseidon/Bare.htm" "Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.0.12) Gecko/20070508 Firefox/1.5.0.12
71.162.42.239 - - [30/Dec/2007:18:29:12 +0000] "GET /quo/quostrippedbare.htm HTTP/1.1" 304 - "http://takeourworldback.planetquo.net/Site_Pages/Poseidon/Bare.htm" "Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.0.12) Gecko/20070508 Firefox/1.5.0.12
Same guy from PA checking it via a different hyperlink and getting a code 304 (content not changed). Those three IPs are all the same; the reason that the last two numbers of Quasimodo's IP are different on his December 24 visit (23rd by his time) is that he has a dynamic rather than static IP. If he disconnects and then reconnects to the internet, he is allocated a number at random within the ISP's permitted range.
The website logs show that, after this page was published, there was little interest in it apart from the people listed above who all took a look, along with my associates and myself.

I have talked to Jamie and Nina via Skype.
Yes, I already know that you stupid bitch. As per usual, you tell me nothing that I don�t already know.
I look forward to reading your public explanation of why and when you decided to stab Michael and I in the back and defect to the enemy camp. And after you made your announcement, you will be nuked. I trust that you have an adequate supply of duct-tape, because you are sure going to need it lady.
I had lengthy conversations with them both separately and together.
As friends and associates do. I trust that you recorded the conversations that you had with Crimes of Zion and A Possum Princess just as I suspect you secretly recorded the conversations you had with Michael and I. If so, and if any of these recordings are ever made public, then you will be asked to explain why you publicly asked Crimes of Zion for permission to record your conversation (which he refused), but did not seek the permission of Michael and I with regard to recording the conversations you held with us.
They seem okay to me and are definitely not agents.
So incredibly stupid are you Suzette, that you couldn�t even suss TomGoy yet here you are telling me that Crimes of Zion and A Possum Princess are �definitely� not agents for the sole reason that they �seem okay� to you. I care not what you think. Your thoughts are but a cork floating on the sea of inconsequence. Please spare me your thoughts. Keep them to yourself.
Why don't you talk to them so that you can get a vibe on them?
I do not hold conversations with my enemies unless it is to discuss the terms of their surrender. Your new friend Crimes of Zion declared war on me. Remember? What a short memory you have Suzette, how fickle you are.
As you know, Steve has talked to them.
Yes, I know. But despite Michael and I wishing to speak with Poseidon, he prefers to talk with Crimes of Zion and A Possum Princess.
Mike Hamme has not talked to them.
I�m delighted to hear that Mike Hamme has more sense than you. That said, if Mike was a complete and utter imbecile, he�d still be much smarter than you.
He wasn't home when I was Skyping with them.
Which logically means he was out.
While I have no issues with Mike, and like the guy, Mike is, however, an associate of yours. In view of this, I felt compelled to delete him from my list of SKYPE contacts. From this point on, I speak only with Michael. I trust Michael implicitly � one hundred per cent. I would trust him with my life. I cannot say the same of you Suzette. I never trusted you fully. Now I don�t trust you at all.
Don�t worry though, I won�t be spending weeks on end posting contrived, melodramatic messages on Wake Up From Your Slumber complaining of how you my �good friend� and �ally� have �betrayed� me. Like Infensus Mentis,
Suzette The Whippette, The Defender Of The Goyim was were never my good friend, Like Infensus Mentis,
Suzette The Whippette, The Defender Of The Goyim was nothing other than an Internet contact with whom I have had no association outwith cyberspace. And Like Infensus Mentis, Suzette The Whippette, The Defender Of The Goyim got binned. Remember that Suzette. I binned you.
Jamie and Nina are not all those other people that you and Jim claim they are.
How do you know? Michael and I have produced a plethora of evidence that says they are, with mountains more yet to come. You don�t the half of it. You were told what only what was felt you should know. Your treachery serves only to confirm that it was wise to not make you privy to all the information and evidence that Michael and I have at our disposal.
Michael and I stand by our research and the evidence we have presented. We will expand upon what has already been made public. As I say, you don�t know the half of it. There is more yet to come � a lot of more. Indeed, so much evidence have we have amassed that it has become an onerous task collating it and writing a report on it. You will choke on your words Suzette. I promise you � I give you my word.
So then Suzette, where is your evidence that Michael and I got it all wrong? What research have you done to counter the evidence that we have presented? Where is your research? Put up or shut-up.
You have no hard evidence.
How do you know what evidence Michael and I have? As I say, you are so far out of the loop that you were barely in it in the first place.
And remember, when I pointed out that Nina's and Gina's ears are totally different (Nina having unattached earlobes, Gina having attached earlobes; and the shape and size of the ears is not the same), you said "it matters not".
You still don�t get it you stupid cow, do you? Click on the image and take a long, hard look.
Which is Nina? Does Nina number one look exactly like Nina number six? Does Nina number two bear a striking resemblance to Nina number seven? Nina number six and Nina number seven do, however, look remarkably similar. The only problem is that Nina number seven is not Nina. Nina number seven is Gina. Have you got it yet Suzette? Has the penny dropped? Go figure.
It does matter, because it prooves that they are different women!
Once again, take a look at the seven Ninas pictured above. Are you publicly prepared to state on the front page of PlanetQuo.Com that you believe Ninas 1-6 are the same woman. If so, write a brief article stating your case, and I will publish. If you are not prepared to do this, then consider shutting your mouth as an alternative.
When you do your groundwork in your travels throughout Australia, you could go to Perth and check out Jamie Linton and Brendon O'Connell.
As far as I am aware, Michael does not travel. He did in his younger days, but since he is now a married man in his forties, he has done all his traveling and has no desire to do any more. Why don�t you take a trip across to Los Angeles and check-our Eireann Goddess? Nina lives not far from you. You could have a photograph taken together. Until such times, kindly refrain from dispensing unsolicited advice. Your opinion is inconsequential as far as Michael and I are concerned.
And why all this delay in really going after Daryl, but most especially Eric?
Smith and Hufschmid will be dealt with when Michael and I are ready to deal with them. If our strategy is not your satisfaction, then why don�t YOU go after them? You are, after all, Suzette the Whippette. Why not go whip �em good instead of asking me questions to which you have no right to expect an answer.
If anyone is an agent, it would be Eric.
Just a few paragraphs you were speaking of �hard evidence� If you believe Hufschmid to be such an obvious agent, then why not write an article wherein you provide �hard evidence� in substantiation of your theory? If you were to spend less on chatting to people via SKYPE, Yahoo messenger and MSN messenger, and if you were to spend more time doing some useful research, then you might just be able to produce some written work that people might want to read. I won�t be holding my breath though.
Or perhaps, as some have thought, Daryl and Eric are not agents, but simply want to be number one in the 911 truth movement and are somewhat paranoid.
What truth movement is this that you speak of Suzette? The 9-11 truth is a mish-mash of intelligence operatives, shills, useful idiots, a few honest researchers and some concerned citizens. Most of the useful idiots whom I have encountered have all been encountered via MySpace. I do believe that is how I became acquainted with Suzette The Whippette, The Defender Of The Goyim. The 9-11 �truth� movement is so divided and infiltrated that is wholly ineffective. That is why it was created in the first place stupid. You have much to learn to Suzette. You cannot even figure-out an idiot like Tom Goy without my input, yet here you are waxing lyrical about what you think might be Smith and Hufschmid�s raison d,etre. Get a clue Suzette.
Smith doesn�t do any research, and having gained �credibility via his book and video, Daryl�s webmaster�s contribution vis a vis 9-11 since, is negligible. Eric prefers to talk about the Apollo moon-landings and cow sperm than the twin towers these days.
Eric certainly does attack a lot of people and tries to start fights.
Yes, I had noticed. Your new friends and associates, Crimes of Zion and A Possum Princess, share Eric�s penchant.
Maybe this attacking is just an attempt to eliminate the "competition".
Competition? What competition? With whom are Smith and his webmaster supposedly competing? You make Smith and Hufschmid sound like a pair of Mafia gangsters vying with others for control of some lucrative market. Are you suggesting that they Attack Jones because he sells more 9-11 videos than Eric does? Are Daryl and Eric planning a hit on Alberto Pastore because his much-more informative sells more copies than Hufschmid�s?
And as I know firsthand, Daryl and Eric are somewhat lacking in honesty, and are rather loose with the truth.
Yes, Smith and Hufschmid are proven liars with no integrity. For you to say that the gruesome twosome �are rather loose with the truth� is akin to telling me that George W. Bush is a bit of an idiot or that with Crimes of Zion and A Possum Princess are a bit of a Zionist front.
You are not exactly a model of integrity yourself Suzette. Go take a look in the mirror. And after you have finished gazing at your own reflection, then go fuck yourself. I want nothing more to do with you.
Don�t ever contact me again Suzette. Understood?
Jim Kerr
Webmaster
www.planetquo.com
www.planetquo.net